Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
European Journal of International Relations
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SIVERSON, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Democracies and War Participation:

In Defense of the Institutional Constraints Argument

RANDOLPH M. SIVERSON

University of California, Davis

Two explanations have been advanced for the `democratic peace'; one is built on shared values and norms of democratic political systems, the other focuses on the constraints under which democratic political leaders make decisions or hold office. Constraints theory implies that democracies should be generally more peaceful, while previous analyses indicate they are as warlike as other states, except in their dealings with each other. However, constraints theory cannot be dismissed on this basis because extant empirical research has not distinguished between (1) various levels of war participation and (2) the different latitudes of choice available to leaders. An empirical analysis of international wars in the period 1816-1974 supports the expectations and strengthens the argument about the effects of institutional constraints in relation to expected losses in war. The article concludes with the suggestion that the shared values and norms explanation might be weakened if analysis was extended to include colonial wars.

European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 1, No. 4, 481-489 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/1354066195001004004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Conflict Management and Peace ScienceHome page
M. T. Koch and S. Cranmer
Testing the "Dick Cheney" Hypothesis: Do Governments of the Left Attract More Terrorism than Governments of the Right?
Conflict Management and Peace Science, September 1, 2007; 24(4): 311 - 326.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
P. L. Sullivan
War Aims and War Outcomes: Why Powerful States Lose Limited Wars
Journal of Conflict Resolution, June 1, 2007; 51(3): 496 - 524.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
B. Lacina
Explaining the Severity of Civil Wars
Journal of Conflict Resolution, April 1, 2006; 50(2): 276 - 289.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
M. Koch and S. S. Gartner
Casualties and Constituencies: Democratic Accountability, Electoral Institutions, and Costly Conflicts
Journal of Conflict Resolution, December 1, 2005; 49(6): 874 - 894.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
T. L. Chapman and D. Reiter
The United Nations Security Council and the Rally 'Round the Flag Effect
Journal of Conflict Resolution, December 1, 2004; 48(6): 886 - 909.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
S. S. Gartner, G. M. Segura, and B. A. Barratt
War Casualties, Policy Positions, and the Fate of Legislators
Political Research Quarterly, September 1, 2004; 57(3): 467 - 477.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
M. J. Ireland and S. S. Gartner
Time to Fight: Government Type and Conflict Initiation in Parliamentary Systems
Journal of Conflict Resolution, October 1, 2001; 45(5): 547 - 568.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
M. Horowitz and D. Reiter
When Does Aerial Bombing Work?: Quantitative Empirical Tests, 1917-1999
Journal of Conflict Resolution, April 1, 2001; 45(2): 147 - 173.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
M. Mousseau and Y. Shi
A Test for Reverse Causality in the Democratic Peace Relationship
Journal of Peace Research, November 1, 1999; 36(6): 639 - 663.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
K. Rasler and W. R. Thompson
Predatory Initiators and Changing Landscapes for Warfare
Journal of Conflict Resolution, August 1, 1999; 43(4): 411 - 433.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
P. James and J. Sebastien Rioux
International Crises and Linkage Politics: The Experiences of the United States, 1953-1994
Political Research Quarterly, September 1, 1998; 51(3): 781 - 812.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
D. Reiter and A. C. Stam III
Democracy and Battlefield Military Effectiveness
Journal of Conflict Resolution, June 1, 1998; 42(3): 259 - 277.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
S. S. Gartner and G. M. Segura
War, Casualties, and Public Opinion
Journal of Conflict Resolution, June 1, 1998; 42(3): 278 - 300.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
M. Mousseau
Democracy and Compromise in Militarized Interstate Conflicts, 1816-1992
Journal of Conflict Resolution, April 1, 1998; 42(2): 210 - 230.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
S. McLaughlin, S. Gates, H. Hegre, R. Gissinger, and N. P. Gleditsch
Timing the Changes in Political Structures: A new Polity Database
Journal of Conflict Resolution, April 1, 1998; 42(2): 231 - 242.
[Abstract]


Home page
Conflict Management and Peace ScienceHome page
J. L. Ray
R. J. Rummel's Understanding Conflict and War: An Overlooked Classic?
Conflict Management and Peace Science, January 1, 1998; 16(2): 125 - 147.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
J. R. Oneal and J. L. Ray
New Tests of the Democratic Peace: Controlling for Economic Interdependence, 1950-85
Political Research Quarterly, December 1, 1997; 50(4): 751 - 775.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
S. S. Gartner, G. M. Segura, and M. Wilkening
All Politics Are Local: Local Losses and Individual Attitudes toward the Vietnam War
Journal of Conflict Resolution, October 1, 1997; 41(5): 669 - 694.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
T. Bachteler
Explaining the Democratic Peace: The Evidence from Ancient Greece Reviewed
Journal of Peace Research, August 1, 1997; 34(3): 315 - 323.
[Abstract]


Home page
European Journal of International RelationsHome page
T. J. VOLGY and J. E. SCHWARZ
Free Trade, Economic Inequality and the Stability of Democracies in the Democratic Core of Peace
European Journal of International Relations, June 1, 1997; 3(2): 239 - 253.



Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
M. Mousseau
Democracy and Militarized Interstate Collaboration
Journal of Peace Research, February 1, 1997; 34(1): 73 - 87.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
B. B. De Mesquita and R. M. Siverson
Nasty or Nice?: Political Systems, Endogenous Norms, and the Treatment of Adversaries
Journal of Conflict Resolution, February 1, 1997; 41(1): 175 - 199.
[Abstract]


Home page
Conflict Management and Peace ScienceHome page
R. M. Siverson
Thinking About Puzzles in the Study of International War
Conflict Management and Peace Science, January 1, 1996; 15(2): 113 - 132.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
European Journal of International RelationsHome page
N. P. GLEDITSCH
Democracy and the Future of European Peace
European Journal of International Relations, December 1, 1995; 1(4): 539 - 571.
[Abstract]