Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
European Journal of International Relations
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Caprioli, M.
Right arrow Articles by Trumbore, P. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Identifying `Rogue' States and Testing their Interstate Conflict Behavior

Mary Caprioli

University of Tennessee, USA

Peter F. Trumbore

Oakland University, USA

We explore and define the concept of a `rogue' state based on a state's domestic patterns of behavior. We combine measures of domestic gender equality, ethnic discrimination and state repression to identify characteristics of rogue states. Once we have identified rogue states, we perform logistic regression to predict whether rogue states are more likely to be the aggressors during international disputes — whether they are more likely to use force first during interstate conflict, controlling for other possible causes of state use of force. This research adds to a growing body of scholarship in International Relations regarding the behavior of states involved in conflict, which demonstrates that states with higher levels of inequality, repression and violence exhibit higher levels of violence during international disputes and during international crises. This argument is most fully developed within feminist scholarship; however, research in the field of ethno-apolitical conflict has also highlighted the negative impact of domestic discrimination and violence on state behavior at the international level.

Key Words: discrimination • nequality • international conflict • repression • rogue states

European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 9, No. 3, 377-406 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/13540661030093002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
M. Caprioli and P. F. Trumbore
First Use of Violent Force in Militarized Interstate Disputes, 1980-2001
Journal of Peace Research, November 1, 2006; 43(6): 741 - 749.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
M. Caprioli and P. F. Trumbore
Human Rights Rogues in Interstate Disputes, 1980-2001
Journal of Peace Research, March 1, 2006; 43(2): 131 - 148.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
M. Caprioli and P. F. Trumbore
Rhetoric versus Reality: Rogue States in Interstate Conflict
Journal of Conflict Resolution, October 1, 2005; 49(5): 770 - 791.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Security DialogueHome page
M. Caprioli
Democracy and Human Rights Versus Women's Security: A Contradiction?
Security Dialogue, December 1, 2004; 35(4): 411 - 428.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
European Journal of International RelationsHome page
D. Archibugi
Cosmopolitan Democracy and its Critics: A Review
European Journal of International Relations, September 1, 2004; 10(3): 437 - 473.
[Abstract] [PDF]