This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by PAYNE, R. A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Persuasion, Frames and Norm Construction

University of Louisville, USA

Constructivist theorists view norms as shared understandings that reflect `legitimate social purpose'. Because the focus is on the ideational building blocks that undergird a community's shared understandings, rather than material forces, persuasive communication is considered fundamentally important to norm-building. In practice, this means that frames are crafted by norm entrepreneurs so as to resonate with audiences. However, the constructivist empirical literature illustrates the central importance of material levers in achieving normative change. Those who promote specific norms also manipulate frames strategically to achieve their ends and do not necessarily convince others to alter their preferences. The global debate over `core labor standards' is highlighted to illustrate the various means by which frames can be distorted by communicators acting strategically, perhaps even to secure their own instrumental interests or to maintain their powerful status. Norms that do not reflect a genuinely voluntary consensus can be seen as illegitimate.

Key Words: communication • constructivist theory • frames (or framing) • Habermas • international norms • persuasion

European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 7, No. 1, 37-61 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/1354066101007001002


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. A. White Explaining Differences in Child Care Policy Development in France and the USA: Norms, Frames, Programmatic Ideas International Political Science Review/ Revue internationale de science pol, September 1, 2009; 30(4): 385 - 405. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Ish-Shalom The Rhetorical Capital of Theories: The Democratic Peace and the Road to the Roadmap International Political Science Review/ Revue internationale de science pol, June 1, 2008; 29(3): 281 - 301. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. R. Krebs and P. T. Jackson Twisting Tongues and Twisting Arms: The Power of Political Rhetoric European Journal of International Relations, March 1, 2007; 13(1): 35 - 66. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Kotzian Arguing and Bargaining in International Negotiations: On the Application of the Frame-Selection Model and its Implications International Political Science Review/ Revue internationale de science pol, January 1, 2007; 28(1): 79 - 99. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Hagel and P. Peretz States and Transnational Actors: Who's Influencing Whom? A Case Study in Jewish Diaspora Politics during the Cold War European Journal of International Relations, December 1, 2005; 11(4): 467 - 493. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Muller Arguing, Bargaining and all that: Communicative Action, Rationalist Theory and the Logic of Appropriateness in International Relations European Journal of International Relations, September 1, 2004; 10(3): 395 - 435. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Wiener Contested Compliance: Interventions on the Normative Structure of World Politics European Journal of International Relations, June 1, 2004; 10(2): 189 - 234. [Abstract] [PDF]