Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
European Journal of International Relations
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BERNSTEIN, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Ideas, Social Structure and the Compromise of Liberal Environmentalism

STEVEN BERNSTEIN

University of Toronto

Recent scholarship on international norms neglects the question of why some norms get selected over others to define and regulate appropriate behavior. I introduce a `socio-evolutionary' explanation for the entrance and evolution of norms, which focuses on the interaction of ideas with the social structure they encounter. This explanation best accounts for the most significant shift in environmental governance over the last 30 years, the surprising convergence of environmental and liberal economic norms toward `liberal environmentalism'. The 1992 Earth Summit institutionalized these norms, which predicate environmental protection on the promotion and maintenance of a liberal economic order. Current scholarship on international environmental institutions largely ignores the normative underpinnings of responses to environmental problems owing to its preoccupation with form and function, and thus cannot explain the shift. The proposed explanation also outperforms an `epistemic communities' explanation in its paradigmatic case, challenging the presumed primacy of science in environmental governance. Its advantages are also shown over power, interest and existing ideational approaches to normative development.

Key Words: environmentalism • global governance • ideas • international institutions • liberalism • norms • social structure

European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 6, No. 4, 464-512 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/1354066100006004002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Comparative Political StudiesHome page
L. A. WHITE
Ideas and the Welfare State: Explaining Child Care Policy Development in Canada and the United States
Comparative Political Studies, August 1, 2002; 35(6): 713 - 743.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Prog Hum GeogrHome page
N. Castree
Environmental issues: from policy to political economy
Progress in Human Geography, June 1, 2002; 26(3): 357 - 365.
[PDF]


Home page
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social ScienceHome page
D. Stevis
Agents, Subjects, Objects, or Phantoms? Labor, the Environment, and Liberal Institutionalization
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, January 1, 2002; 581(1): 91 - 105.
[Abstract] [PDF]