This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by ZÜRN, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Democratic Governance Beyond the Nation-State:

The EU and Other International Institutions

Institute for Intercultural and International Studies (InIIS), University of Bremen

International institutions not only increase system effectiveness or output legitimacy, but are also a normatively plausible response to the problems for democracy that are caused by globalization. In this way, international institutions also increase input legitimacy. It is therefore a false approach to pin down the problem of democracy beyond the nation-state as a choice between `effective problem-solving through international institutions' and `democratic political processes'. At the same time, it is indisputable that the actual functioning of these international institutions does not meet democratic standards. By correctly pointing to the deficits of current international institutions, sceptics too quickly conclude that most deficits in the working of international institutions cannot be remedied. The sceptical argument is founded on two more or less explicit background hypotheses that can be empirically challenged. The first background hypothesis states that a demos cannot exist at the transnational level. I will modify this statement in theoretical terms and offer some conceptual distinctions that may prepare the ground for further empirical investigation. The second background hypothesis of the sceptics postulates a zero-sum relationship between national sovereignty and supranationality. I will put forward some concrete institutional proposals that undermine the zero-sum logic of the sceptics, concluding that in a denationalized society, democratic legitimacy can only be achieved by a mixed constitution comprising majority procedures and negotiation mechanisms.

Key Words: democracy • demos • EU • globalization/denationalization • international institutions

European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 6, No. 2, 183-221 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/1354066100006002002


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Antonsich The Narration of Europe in `National' and `Post-national' Terms: Gauging the Gap between Normative Discourses and People's Views European Journal of Social Theory, November 1, 2008; 11(4): 505 - 522. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Pfetsch, S. Adam, and B. Eschner The contribution of the press to Europeanization of public debates: A comparative study of issue salience and conflict lines of European integration Journalism, August 1, 2008; 9(4): 465 - 492. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Bartelson Making Sense of Global Civil Society European Journal of International Relations, September 1, 2006; 12(3): 371 - 395. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Agne A Dogma of Democratic Theory and Globalization: Why Politics Need not Include Everyone it Affects European Journal of International Relations, September 1, 2006; 12(3): 433 - 458. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Archibugi Cosmopolitan Democracy and its Critics: A Review European Journal of International Relations, September 1, 2004; 10(3): 437 - 473. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Sjursen Changes to European Security in a Communicative Perspective Cooperation and Conflict, June 1, 2004; 39(2): 107 - 128. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. JUNG The Political Sociology of World Society European Journal of International Relations, December 1, 2001; 7(4): 443 - 474. [Abstract] [PDF]