Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
European Journal of International Relations
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BERNSTEIN, S.
Right arrow Articles by WEBER, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

God Gave Physics the Easy Problems:

Adapting Social Science to an Unpredictable World

STEVEN BERNSTEIN

University of Toronto, The Ohio State University, University of Toronto and University of California at Berkeley

RICHARD NED LEBOW

University of Toronto, The Ohio State University, University of Toronto and University of California at Berkeley

JANICE GROSS STEIN

University of Toronto, The Ohio State University, University of Toronto and University of California at Berkeley

STEVEN WEBER

University of Toronto, The Ohio State University, University of Toronto and University of California at Berkeley

For conceptual and empirical reasons the quest for predictive theory rests on a mistaken analogy between physical and social phenomena. Evolutionary biology is a more productive analogy for social science. We explore the value of this analogy in its `hard' and `soft' versions, and examine the implications of both for theory and research in International Relations. We develop the case for forward `tracking' of International Relations on the basis of local and general knowledge as a constructive response to the problems we identify in backward-looking attempts to build deductive, nomothetic theory.

Key Words: analogies to science • ethnic conflict • forecasting • privatization of security • proliferation • scenarios

European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 6, No. 1, 43-76 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/1354066100006001003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
European Journal of International RelationsHome page
F. Chernoff
Conventionalism as an Adequate Basis for Policy-Relevant IR Theory
European Journal of International Relations, March 1, 2009; 15(1): 157 - 194.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
European Journal of International RelationsHome page
T. B. Pepinsky
From Agents to Outcomes: Simulation in International Relations
European Journal of International Relations, September 1, 2005; 11(3): 367 - 394.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
S. CHAN
On Different Types of International Relations Scholarship
Journal of Peace Research, November 1, 2002; 39(6): 747 - 756.
[Abstract] [PDF]