This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (7) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Krebs, R. R. Articles by Jackson, P. T. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Twisting Tongues and Twisting Arms: The Power of Political Rhetoric

University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA

Patrick Thaddeus Jackson

American University, Washington, DC, USA

While scholars of International Relations and comparative politics have usually treated rhetoric as epiphenomenal, one strand of constructivism has recently returned rhetoric to the heart of political analysis, especially through the mechanism of persuasion. We too maintain that rhetoric is central to political processes and outcomes, but we argue that persuasion is theoretically and methodologically problematic. We aver that rhetoric's role may be more usefully conceptualized in the context of coercion, and we advance a stylized model that illustrates how rhetorical coercion operates, explains why it works, and identifies key scope conditions. We subsequently illustrate our model's relevance through a detailed examination of a ‘hard’ case. This article's agenda is twofold. First, it advises scholars in these fields to avoid focusing on unanswerable questions about actors' motives and to examine instead what actors say, in what contexts, and to what audiences. Second, it lays the groundwork for a ‘coercive constructivism’, complementing the liberal version so prevalent today.

Key Words: coercion • constructivism • discourse • Habermas • Israel • military service • persuasion • rhetoric

European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 13, No. 1, 35-66 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1354066107074284


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. M. Kitchen Argument and Identity Change in the Atlantic Security Community Security Dialogue, February 1, 2009; 40(1): 95 - 114. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Roe Actor, Audience(s) and Emergency Measures: Securitization and the UK's Decision to Invade Iraq Security Dialogue, December 1, 2008; 39(6): 615 - 635. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Ambrosetti Human Security as Political Resource: A Response to David Chandler's `Human Security: The Dog That Didn't Bark' Security Dialogue, August 1, 2008; 39(4): 439 - 444. [PDF]

				D. Dimitrakopoulos Norms, Strategies and Political Change: Explaining the Establishment of the Convention on the Future of Europe European Journal of International Relations, June 1, 2008; 14(2): 319 - 341. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Ish-Shalom The Rhetorical Capital of Theories: The Democratic Peace and the Road to the Roadmap International Political Science Review/ Revue internationale de science pol, June 1, 2008; 29(3): 281 - 301. [Abstract] [PDF]