European Journal of International Relations

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bussmann, M.
Right arrow Articles by Wiesehomeier, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 11, No. 4, 551-579 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1354066105057900
© 2005 European Consortium for Political Research, SAGE Publications

Foreign Economic Liberalization and Peace: The Case of Sub-Saharan Africa

Margit Bussmann

University of Konstanz, Germany

Gerald Schneider

University of Konstanz, Germany

Nina Wiesehomeier

University of Konstanz, Germany

A typical adage of the globalization literature is that foreign economic liberalization undermines the social fabric of developing countries. This article examines this claim for the sub-Saharan African countries and thus the continent that experienced both low economic growth and a high incidence of armed conflict during the 1990s. Our results yield support for the assertion that economic openness durably pacifies countries once the restructuring of the economy is over. We can, however, not reject the possibility that the distributional consequences of foreign economic liberalization increase the risk of civil war during the implementation of the reform measures. We contrast this ‘distributional’ model with alternative explanations such as the role of the International Monetary Fund and the level of democracy. A comparative case study on Guinea and Guinea-Bissau lends some illustrative evidence to the claim that compensating the losers of globalization can pacify intrastate relations.

Key Words: Africa • civil war • foreign economic liberalization • globalization • Heckscher-Ohlin • Ricardo-Viner • Structural Adjustment Programmes


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
R. Torenvlied and C. M. Klein Haarhuis
Polarization and Policy Reform: Anti-Corruption Policymaking in Sub-Saharan Africa
Journal of Peace Research, March 1, 2008; 45(2): 223 - 240.
[Abstract] [PDF]